Difference between revisions of ".Mzg2.Nzk1OA"
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
of the Gods. Espe [[deletion]] e [[/deletion]] cially since | of the Gods. Espe [[deletion]] e [[/deletion]] cially since | ||
nothing can be more acceptable | nothing can be more acceptable | ||
− | [[underline]] to [[deletion]] the [[/deletion]] God [[deletion]] s [[/deletion]] himself [[ | + | [[underline]] to [[deletion]] the [[/deletion]] God [[deletion]] s [[/deletion]] himself [[/underline]] [[deletion]] as [[/deletion]] |
than that the way to worship | than that the way to worship | ||
[[deletion]] them [[/deletion]] [[addition]] him [[/addition]] should [[deletion]] lay [[/deletion]] ^ [[addition]] lie [[/addition]] open to all. | [[deletion]] them [[/deletion]] [[addition]] him [[/addition]] should [[deletion]] lay [[/deletion]] ^ [[addition]] lie [[/addition]] open to all. |
Latest revision as of 09:47, 2 April 2020
This law signifies that probity is agreable to the Gods and that deletion dress /deletion addition expence /addition has nothing at all to do with the worship of them.
For deletion when /deletion since poverty is no reproach among men, it ought not to be banish'd from the deletion entrance of the /deletion temples of the Gods. Espe deletion e /deletion cially since nothing can be more acceptable underline to deletion the /deletion God deletion s /deletion himself /underline deletion as /deletion than that the way to worship deletion them /deletion addition him /addition should deletion lay /deletion ^ addition lie /addition open to all.
When Socrates had made a small sacrifice deletion s /deletion out of his small estate he thought that he had not given less than those who had made greater deletion offerings /deletion deletion but out of bigger /deletion addition larger /addition deletion estates /deletion. For