Difference between revisions of ".Mzk0.ODM4NA"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | least they should give [[deletion]] themselves [[/deletion]] [[addition]] way to languor & laziness. | + | least they should give [[deletion]] themselves [[/deletion]] [[addition]] way to languor & laziness. [[/addition]] |
[[deletion]] But [[/deletion]] Luxury which is shamefull at all ages, | [[deletion]] But [[/deletion]] Luxury which is shamefull at all ages, | ||
Latest revision as of 10:37, 3 April 2020
least they should give deletion themselves /deletion addition way to languor & laziness. /addition
deletion But /deletion Luxury which is shamefull at all ages, in an old man is beastly. deletion but if also anyone /deletion addition but if they have also any taste for any ungovern'd /addition passion & it is doubly wrong: because ^ addition it brings a reproach /addition deletion both /deletion ^ addition upon old age itself /addition & makes the intemperance of youth more impudent. deletion & makes youth more /deletion
Therefore such order deletion of action /deletion is to be observed in our actions, that as in a sect spe deletion a /deletion addition e /addition ch so also in life all things ought to be properly adapted. For it is shameful & very wrong, to deletion neat /deletion ^ addition say /addition & witty things when one is talking ^ addition of upon /addition grave deletion ly /deletion matters, but very proper at a banquet. It was well said by Perciles, when he had Sophocles addition the poet /addition for his collegue ^ addition when he was Orator /addition & they were met upon publick business, & by chance a pretty boy passed by, Sophocles said, O Pericles what a fine boy that is! O Sophocles it does not become deletion the /deletion addition a /addition Orator addition only /addition to have deletion unclear /deletion addition his hands undefiled but also /addition
