Difference between revisions of ".NDE2.ODc0OA"
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
[[deletion]] We [[unclear]] ye. nature of things by different senses, [[/deleiton | [[deletion]] We [[unclear]] ye. nature of things by different senses, [[/deleiton | ||
| − | [[deletion]] & our | + | [[deletion]] & our senses ^ [[addition]] [[unclear]] [[/addition]] [[unclear]] they are perceiv'd [[addition]] & investigate [[/addition] our [[unclear]] those Relations [[/deletion]] |
| + | [[deletion]] [[unclear]] [[/deletion]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | By different Senses we find ye. nature of things, | ||
| + | & ^ [[addition]] then [[/addition]] our reason acts upon them, & [[unclear]] what is true, or false; | ||
| + | what may be affirm'd, or deny'd concerning them. Thus by | ||
| + | Sense or Experience; we [[deletion]] see [[/deletion]] [[addition]] perceive [[/addition]] ye. character of a Benefactor, & | ||
| + | of a Beneficiary, [[deletion]] [[unclear]] [[/deletion]] [[addition]] & when we have compar'd we find [[/addition]] another idea | ||
| + | in our mind, [[deletion]] [[unclear]] [[/deletion]] [[addition]] which we call [[/addition]] ye. Relation between ye. Benefactor | ||
| + | & Beneficiary; & in ye. foundation of yt. relation, we perceive | ||
| + | some benefit receiv'd. But are any of these ideas yt. we mean by | ||
| + | ye. Moral Obligation, ye. idea of gratitude due to a Benefactor | ||
| + | from ye. Beneficiary? This is evidently, a distinct perception | ||
| + | plain to some sense, but not ye. result of Reasoning. This Reason | ||
| + | may suggest to a Beneficiary, yt. is in affluence, yt. ye. state | ||
| + | of his Benefactor who is in prison for a small debt, would | ||
| + | be much chang'd for ye. better, if he would give a small | ||
| + | share of his Wealth, yet will Reason, with a certain degree | ||
| + | of Affection, prompt him to such a well plac'd Charity? | ||
| + | Or will ye. perception of his relation of his Benefactor, & | ||
| + | of ye. benefit receiv'd, make him approve such a conduct, | ||
| + | unless we suppose a feeling quite different from yt. | ||
| + | perception of ye. intervening relation, & ye. ground of yt. | ||
| + | Relation? We might therefore wee all ye. possible | ||
Revision as of 19:28, 17 June 2018
26.
& from those suppose Moral obligation to arise. They call a conformity to truth, virtue; & ye. opposite Vice.
deletion We unclear ye. nature of things by different senses, [[/deleiton deletion & our senses ^ addition unclear /addition unclear they are perceiv'd addition & investigate [[/addition] our unclear those Relations /deletion deletion unclear /deletion
By different Senses we find ye. nature of things, & ^ addition then /addition our reason acts upon them, & unclear what is true, or false; what may be affirm'd, or deny'd concerning them. Thus by Sense or Experience; we deletion see /deletion addition perceive /addition ye. character of a Benefactor, & of a Beneficiary, deletion unclear /deletion addition & when we have compar'd we find /addition another idea in our mind, deletion unclear /deletion addition which we call /addition ye. Relation between ye. Benefactor & Beneficiary; & in ye. foundation of yt. relation, we perceive some benefit receiv'd. But are any of these ideas yt. we mean by ye. Moral Obligation, ye. idea of gratitude due to a Benefactor from ye. Beneficiary? This is evidently, a distinct perception plain to some sense, but not ye. result of Reasoning. This Reason may suggest to a Beneficiary, yt. is in affluence, yt. ye. state of his Benefactor who is in prison for a small debt, would be much chang'd for ye. better, if he would give a small share of his Wealth, yet will Reason, with a certain degree of Affection, prompt him to such a well plac'd Charity? Or will ye. perception of his relation of his Benefactor, & of ye. benefit receiv'd, make him approve such a conduct, unless we suppose a feeling quite different from yt. perception of ye. intervening relation, & ye. ground of yt. Relation? We might therefore wee all ye. possible
