Difference between revisions of ".NDE2.ODc1Mg"
(Created page with "26.") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | 27. | |
| + | |||
| + | Relations of tihngs, & yet be quite indifferent to this or yt. | ||
| + | conduct, unless we [[deletion]] were [[/deletion]] [[addition]] had some [[/addition]] sense, or affection, which make us | ||
| + | approve, or disapprove; love, or dislike; ye. other conduct. | ||
| + | Undoubted Reason may perceive an Aptitude to a certain | ||
| + | end, but with some Affection, we cannot have any idea | ||
| + | of an End, & without which we [[deletion]] can have no [[/deletion]] [[addition]] cannot conceive any [[/addition]] inducement | ||
| + | to action. Consequently we must know, ye. natures meant, | ||
| + | for what Ends they are propos'd, & what affection prompt them | ||
| + | to act, before we can [[deletion]] unterstand [[/deletion]] [[addition]] understand ye [[/addition]] Reasons, & fitnesses of things, | ||
| + | which are said [[unclear]] ye. foundation of Morals; otherwise | ||
| + | we are incapable of judging concerning ye. duty requir'd, | ||
| + | or of ye. conduct of him whom we suppose under Moral | ||
| + | Obligation. But when once ye. natures are given, & ye. relation | ||
| + | ascertain'd, we can determine what conduct will be obligatory | ||
| + | to such natures, & adapted to their condition & Oeconomy; yt. | ||
| + | same conduct will be always, & unalterably proper, as long | ||
| + | as ye. same Natures are plac'd in ye. same Relations. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ye. calling Morality a conformity to truth, gives | ||
| + | no idea, but what is equally applicable to Vice; [[deletion]] all those [[/deletion]] [[addition]] whatever | ||
Revision as of 20:07, 17 June 2018
27.
Relations of tihngs, & yet be quite indifferent to this or yt. conduct, unless we deletion were /deletion addition had some /addition sense, or affection, which make us approve, or disapprove; love, or dislike; ye. other conduct. Undoubted Reason may perceive an Aptitude to a certain end, but with some Affection, we cannot have any idea of an End, & without which we deletion can have no /deletion addition cannot conceive any /addition inducement to action. Consequently we must know, ye. natures meant, for what Ends they are propos'd, & what affection prompt them to act, before we can deletion unterstand /deletion addition understand ye /addition Reasons, & fitnesses of things, which are said unclear ye. foundation of Morals; otherwise we are incapable of judging concerning ye. duty requir'd, or of ye. conduct of him whom we suppose under Moral Obligation. But when once ye. natures are given, & ye. relation ascertain'd, we can determine what conduct will be obligatory to such natures, & adapted to their condition & Oeconomy; yt. same conduct will be always, & unalterably proper, as long as ye. same Natures are plac'd in ye. same Relations.
ye. calling Morality a conformity to truth, gives no idea, but what is equally applicable to Vice; deletion all those /deletion addition whatever
