Difference between revisions of ".NDc4OQ.MzQxMDM"
Arthur.burns (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Hanover. | Hanover. | ||
+ | |||
Jany: 16th: 1819 | Jany: 16th: 1819 | ||
Line 7: | Line 8: | ||
Yours No: 24 reached me yesterday | Yours No: 24 reached me yesterday | ||
− | and I return as usual signed the regular enclosures | + | and I return as usual signed the regular enclosures: |
I have of course received the Bailiff's opinion about | I have of course received the Bailiff's opinion about | ||
a grass farm: but still it is [[underline]] not [[/underline]] sufficiently clear: | a grass farm: but still it is [[underline]] not [[/underline]] sufficiently clear: |
Latest revision as of 10:19, 18 June 2019
No: 28.
Hanover.
Jany: 16th: 1819
Dear Daniell,
Yours No: 24 reached me yesterday and I return as usual signed the regular enclosures: I have of course received the Bailiff's opinion about a grass farm: but still it is underline not /underline sufficiently clear: of course underline till /underline my return underline no /underline change underline can /underline be effected: but I want Coates's underline positive /underline opinion whether the continuance of the underline arable /underline farm or the conversion of the underline whole /underline into underline grass /underline except underline the one hundred Acres /underline is underline most /underline advantageous: he underline must /underline also consider that except the alteration of the lambing fold no buildings will be required and the underline arable /underline land is getting into underline better heart & cleaner /underline: under the underline existing /underline and underline future /underline state of things is an underline arable /underline or underline grass /underline farm underline most /underline advantageous: let underline him /underline take his